The space between the shops

Southdale Center in Edina, Minnesota, opened on October 8, 1956, with shopping brought inside an enclosed, weather-protected environment. The useful question is what the roof changed. An indoor shopping street allowed the shared space between stores to be planned as part of the experience, rather than leaving each visit exposed to the weather outside.[1]

The Minnesota Historical Society's account identifies Donald Dayton and architect Victor Gruen in the development of the center. It records 72 stores, with Dayton's and Donaldson's as anchors. These are details of Southdale's opening, not a template for every later mall. They locate the familiar idea of an indoor shopping trip in a specific project.[1]

The same account describes a garden court with features including trees, a fishpond and a birdcage. It also explains that Gruen envisioned a wider development with housing and community facilities. That larger plan matters: the shopping center that opened and the complete community its designer imagined should not be treated as the same achievement.[1]

Two friends browsing record sleeves in a mall shop window
Browsing the shop windows was part of spending time together.

Why the route mattered

Consider the difference between an anchor store and a shop on the way to it. A visitor may arrive intending to reach one destination but pass several others through a common interior. Our interpretation is that this gives the route commercial value. The walk becomes part of the shopping arrangement, even for someone who planned to make only one stop.

The garden court offered another kind of destination. In spatial terms, a broad central area can provide a meeting point or a pause between errands. It does not follow that every visitor used it that way. Design tells us what a place made possible; individual memories tell us which of those possibilities people actually used.

An indoor mall photograph is therefore best read in layers. First identify circulation: doors, stairs, escalators and walkways. Then locate the shops and any shared seating. Finally look for signs that identify the place and period. Decorative plants alone cannot tell you the year, and a familiar chain name may have appeared in many different centers.

Shoppers eating at orange chairs in a mall food court
The food court gave everyone somewhere to pause.

Separate one mall from another

This approach also separates Southdale's documented history from the broader memory of an afternoon at the mall. A food court, arcade or favorite record shop remembered from another decade belongs to that later place. Those memories are useful evidence when attached to a name and time, rather than projected backward onto an opening-day description.

Try sketching a remembered mall from its entrances to the store you visited most. Where did you stop, and where did you arrange to meet? The exercise makes the building's shared spaces visible. Southdale's story helps explain why those spaces deserve attention alongside the shops: the environment between purchases was itself a major part of the design.

What was the meeting spot at your local mall?

Keep this kind of story coming

When browsing was part of the fun.

Follow for forgotten stores, paper wish lists and the little rituals around a family shopping trip.

Follow Back When Daily on Facebook ↗

Prefer email? Get the free Sunday memory letter →Three to five nostalgia stories and a quick quiz. Signup opens on Substack; unsubscribe anytime.

Read next

How to Read an Old Sears Catalog Beyond the Toy Pages →

Before heading to the shops, the catalog could turn an afternoon at home into a wish list.

Sources & further reading

  1. Minnesota Historical Society: Southdale Center and its 1956 opening

Revision note: Added the documented Southdale case, separated Gruen’s broader plan from what opened, and supplied an original way to read a mall layout.

Written with AI assistance. Numbered references connect historical claims to their sources; comparisons and worked examples are our interpretation. Our editorial approach